Albin 78 Cirrus vs Nova 33
How do the Albin 78 Cirrus and Nova 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 78 Cirrus 
Nova 33 | Albin 78 Cirrus | Nova 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 33.0 ft10.06 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 26.3 ft8.00 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 5,181 lb2,350 kg | 8,177 lb3,709 kg |
| Ballast | 2,094 lb950 kg | 3,868 lb1,754 kg |
| Sail area | 281 ft²26.1 m² | 493 ft²45.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.02 | 19.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 223 | 202 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.5 | 19.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.9 |
Albin 78 Cirrus vs Nova 33: the short version
- The Nova 33 is the larger boat at 33.0 ft10.06 m LOA versus 25.6 ft7.80 m for the Albin 78 Cirrus.
- The Nova 33 is heavier, displacing about 58% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nova 33 carries the more powerful rig (19.4 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nova 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nova 33 rates better for offshore work (2.05 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.