Albin 78 Cirrus vs Singoalla 34
How do the Albin 78 Cirrus and Singoalla 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 78 Cirrus 
Singoalla 34 | Albin 78 Cirrus | Singoalla 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 33.7 ft10.26 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 27.3 ft8.33 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 5,181 lb2,350 kg | 8,820 lb4,001 kg |
| Ballast | 2,094 lb950 kg | 3,750 lb1,701 kg |
| Sail area | 281 ft²26.1 m² | 433 ft²40.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.02 | 16.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 223 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.5 | 19.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 7.0 |
Albin 78 Cirrus vs Singoalla 34: the short version
- The Singoalla 34 is the larger boat at 33.7 ft10.26 m LOA versus 25.6 ft7.80 m for the Albin 78 Cirrus.
- The Singoalla 34 is heavier, displacing about 70% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Singoalla 34 carries the more powerful rig (16.2 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Singoalla 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 78 Cirrus rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.