Albin 78 vs Albin 78 Cirrus
How do the Albin 78 and Albin 78 Cirrus compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 78 
Albin 78 Cirrus | Albin 78 | Albin 78 Cirrus | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 21.8 ft6.65 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 9.1 ft2.76 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 4.9 ft1.49 m |
| Displacement | 5,291 lb2,400 kg | 5,181 lb2,350 kg |
| Ballast | 2,205 lb1,000 kg | 2,094 lb950 kg |
| Sail area | 366 ft²34.0 m² | 281 ft²26.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.29 | 15.02 |
| Displacement / Length | 227 | 223 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.9 | 18.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €5,000 | — |
Albin 78 vs Albin 78 Cirrus: the short version
- The Albin 78 and Albin 78 Cirrus are close in length (25.6 ft7.80 m vs 25.6 ft7.80 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Albin 78 carries the more powerful rig (19.3 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 78 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 78 rates better for offshore work (2.08 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.