Albin 78 vs C&C 26
How do the Albin 78 and C&C 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 78 
C&C 26 | Albin 78 | C&C 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 23.6 ft7.19 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 10.4 ft3.18 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 5,291 lb2,400 kg | 5,400 lb2,449 kg |
| Ballast | 2,205 lb1,000 kg | 2,040 lb925 kg |
| Sail area | 366 ft²34.0 m² | 331 ft²30.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.29 | 17.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 227 | 184 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.9 | 15.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 2.38 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | €5,000 | — |
Albin 78 vs C&C 26: the short version
- The Albin 78 and C&C 26 are close in length (25.6 ft7.80 m vs 25.6 ft7.80 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Albin 78 carries the more powerful rig (19.3 vs 17.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 78 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 78 rates better for offshore work (2.08 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.