Albin 79 vs Albin 82 MS
How do the Albin 79 and Albin 82 MS compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 79 
Albin 82 MS | Albin 79 | Albin 82 MS | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.9 ft7.90 m | 29.9 ft9.12 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 9.3 ft2.84 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 7,496 lb3,400 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 259 ft²24.1 m² | 323 ft²30.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.92 | 13.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 214 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.6 | 22.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 1.91 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.7 |
Albin 79 vs Albin 82 MS: the short version
- The Albin 82 MS is the larger boat at 29.9 ft9.12 m LOA versus 25.9 ft7.90 m for the Albin 79.
- The Albin 82 MS is heavier, displacing about 78% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin 79 carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 82 MS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 82 MS rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.