Albin 79 vs Cumulus 28
How do the Albin 79 and Cumulus 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 79 | Albin 79 | Cumulus 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.9 ft7.90 m | 28.1 ft8.56 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 22.3 ft6.81 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 7,055 lb3,200 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 2,812 lb1,276 kg |
| Sail area | 259 ft²24.1 m² | 363 ft²33.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.92 | 15.79 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 283 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.6 | 23.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 1.93 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.3 |
Albin 79 vs Cumulus 28: the short version
- The Cumulus 28 is the larger boat at 28.1 ft8.56 m LOA versus 25.9 ft7.90 m for the Albin 79.
- The Cumulus 28 is heavier, displacing about 68% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin 79 carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cumulus 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cumulus 28 rates better for offshore work (1.93 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.