Albin 79 vs Delta 31
How do the Albin 79 and Delta 31 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 79 | Albin 79 | Delta 31 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.9 ft7.90 m | 30.7 ft9.35 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 10.0 ft3.04 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 8,598 lb3,900 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 3,505 lb1,590 kg |
| Sail area | 259 ft²24.1 m² | 436 ft²40.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.92 | 16.62 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 248 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.6 | 23.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 1.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.7 |
Albin 79 vs Delta 31: the short version
- The Delta 31 is the larger boat at 30.7 ft9.35 m LOA versus 25.9 ft7.90 m for the Albin 79.
- The Delta 31 is heavier, displacing about 105% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Delta 31 carries the more powerful rig (16.6 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Delta 31 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Delta 31 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.