Albin 79 vs Singoalla 34
How do the Albin 79 and Singoalla 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 79 
Singoalla 34 | Albin 79 | Singoalla 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.9 ft7.90 m | 33.7 ft10.26 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 27.3 ft8.33 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 8,820 lb4,001 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 3,750 lb1,701 kg |
| Sail area | 259 ft²24.1 m² | 433 ft²40.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.92 | 16.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.6 | 19.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 7.0 |
Albin 79 vs Singoalla 34: the short version
- The Singoalla 34 is the larger boat at 33.7 ft10.26 m LOA versus 25.9 ft7.90 m for the Albin 79.
- The Singoalla 34 is heavier, displacing about 110% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Singoalla 34 carries the more powerful rig (16.2 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Singoalla 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Singoalla 34 rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.