Albin 79 vs Stratus 36
How do the Albin 79 and Stratus 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 79 | Albin 79 | Stratus 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.9 ft7.90 m | 35.2 ft10.72 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 11,466 lb5,201 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 4,960 lb2,250 kg |
| Sail area | 259 ft²24.1 m² | 506 ft²47.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.92 | 15.92 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 253 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.6 | 25.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 7.0 |
Albin 79 vs Stratus 36: the short version
- The Stratus 36 is the larger boat at 35.2 ft10.72 m LOA versus 25.9 ft7.90 m for the Albin 79.
- The Stratus 36 is heavier, displacing about 173% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Stratus 36 carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Stratus 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Stratus 36 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.