Albin 82 MS vs Albin Express
How do the Albin 82 MS and Albin Express compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 82 MS 
Albin Express | Albin 82 MS | Albin Express | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 25.5 ft7.77 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 21.6 ft6.58 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 3,968 lb1,800 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 299 ft²27.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.49 | 19.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 176 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 16.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | — | €5,000 |
Albin 82 MS vs Albin Express: the short version
- The Albin 82 MS is the larger boat at 29.9 ft9.12 m LOA versus 25.5 ft7.77 m for the Albin Express.
- The Albin 82 MS is heavier, displacing about 89% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Express carries the more powerful rig (19.1 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 82 MS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 82 MS rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.07).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.