Albin 82 MS vs Bahama 30
How do the Albin 82 MS and Bahama 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 82 MS 
Bahama 30 | Albin 82 MS | Bahama 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 29.9 ft9.12 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 24.6 ft7.49 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 10.0 ft3.05 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 8,230 lb3,733 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 3,130 lb1,420 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 450 ft²41.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.49 | 17.66 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 247 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 22.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Albin 82 MS vs Bahama 30: the short version
- The Albin 82 MS and Bahama 30 are close in length (29.9 ft9.12 m vs 29.9 ft9.12 m ).
- The Bahama 30 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bahama 30 carries the more powerful rig (17.7 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bahama 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 82 MS rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 1.98).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.