Albin 82 MS vs Ballad 30
How do the Albin 82 MS and Ballad 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 82 MS 
Ballad 30 | Albin 82 MS | Ballad 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 29.9 ft9.12 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 22.6 ft6.88 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 9.7 ft2.95 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 7,276 lb3,300 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 3,417 lb1,550 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 370 ft²34.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.49 | 15.77 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 282 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 22.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Albin 82 MS vs Ballad 30: the short version
- The Albin 82 MS and Ballad 30 are close in length (29.9 ft9.12 m vs 29.9 ft9.12 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Ballad 30 carries the more powerful rig (15.8 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 82 MS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 82 MS rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.