Albin 82 MS vs Cumulus 28
How do the Albin 82 MS and Cumulus 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 82 MS 
Cumulus 28 | Albin 82 MS | Cumulus 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 28.1 ft8.56 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 22.3 ft6.81 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 7,055 lb3,200 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 2,812 lb1,276 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 363 ft²33.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.49 | 15.79 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 283 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 23.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 1.93 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 6.3 |
Albin 82 MS vs Cumulus 28: the short version
- The Albin 82 MS is the larger boat at 29.9 ft9.12 m LOA versus 28.1 ft8.56 m for the Cumulus 28.
- On sail area/displacement the Cumulus 28 carries the more powerful rig (15.8 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cumulus 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 82 MS rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 1.93).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.