Albin 82 MS vs Nimbus 42
How do the Albin 82 MS and Nimbus 42 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 82 MS 
Nimbus 42 | Albin 82 MS | Nimbus 42 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 41.4 ft12.62 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 34.2 ft10.42 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 12.5 ft3.81 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 23,325 lb10,580 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 10,000 lb4,536 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 854 ft²79.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.49 | 16.74 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 261 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 34.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 7.8 |
Albin 82 MS vs Nimbus 42: the short version
- The Nimbus 42 is the larger boat at 41.4 ft12.62 m LOA versus 29.9 ft9.12 m for the Albin 82 MS.
- The Nimbus 42 is heavier, displacing about 211% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nimbus 42 carries the more powerful rig (16.7 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nimbus 42 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nimbus 42 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 1.91).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.