Albin 82 MS vs Nova 33
How do the Albin 82 MS and Nova 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 82 MS 
Nova 33 | Albin 82 MS | Nova 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 33.0 ft10.06 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 26.3 ft8.00 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 8,177 lb3,709 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 3,868 lb1,754 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 493 ft²45.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.49 | 19.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 202 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 19.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 6.9 |
Albin 82 MS vs Nova 33: the short version
- The Nova 33 is the larger boat at 33.0 ft10.06 m LOA versus 29.9 ft9.12 m for the Albin 82 MS.
- The Nova 33 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nova 33 carries the more powerful rig (19.4 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 82 MS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 82 MS rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.