Albin 82 MS vs Santana 30/30
How do the Albin 82 MS and Santana 30/30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 82 MS 
Santana 30/30 | Albin 82 MS | Santana 30/30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 29.9 ft9.12 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 25.4 ft7.75 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 10.3 ft3.12 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 6,500 lb2,948 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 2,310 lb1,048 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 440 ft²40.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.49 | 20.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 177 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 16.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 6.8 |
Albin 82 MS vs Santana 30/30: the short version
- The Albin 82 MS and Santana 30/30 are close in length (29.9 ft9.12 m vs 29.9 ft9.12 m ).
- The Albin 82 MS is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Santana 30/30 carries the more powerful rig (20.2 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 82 MS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 82 MS rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.