Albin 82 MS vs Seafarer 30
How do the Albin 82 MS and Seafarer 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 82 MS 
Seafarer 30 | Albin 82 MS | Seafarer 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 29.9 ft9.13 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 10.0 ft3.05 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 8,600 lb3,901 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 3,450 lb1,565 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 389 ft²36.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.49 | 14.83 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 229 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 23.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 1.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 6.8 |
Albin 82 MS vs Seafarer 30: the short version
- The Albin 82 MS and Seafarer 30 are close in length (29.9 ft9.12 m vs 29.9 ft9.13 m ).
- The Seafarer 30 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Seafarer 30 carries the more powerful rig (14.8 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Seafarer 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 82 MS rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 1.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.