Albin 82 MS vs Singoalla 34
How do the Albin 82 MS and Singoalla 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 82 MS 
Singoalla 34 | Albin 82 MS | Singoalla 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 33.7 ft10.26 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 27.3 ft8.33 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 8,820 lb4,001 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 3,750 lb1,701 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 433 ft²40.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.49 | 16.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 19.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 7.0 |
Albin 82 MS vs Singoalla 34: the short version
- The Singoalla 34 is the larger boat at 33.7 ft10.26 m LOA versus 29.9 ft9.12 m for the Albin 82 MS.
- The Singoalla 34 is heavier, displacing about 18% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Singoalla 34 carries the more powerful rig (16.2 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 82 MS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 82 MS rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.