Albin 82 MS vs Stratus 36
How do the Albin 82 MS and Stratus 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 82 MS 
Stratus 36 | Albin 82 MS | Stratus 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 35.2 ft10.72 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 11,466 lb5,201 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 4,960 lb2,250 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 506 ft²47.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.49 | 15.92 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 253 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 25.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 7.0 |
Albin 82 MS vs Stratus 36: the short version
- The Stratus 36 is the larger boat at 35.2 ft10.72 m LOA versus 29.9 ft9.12 m for the Albin 82 MS.
- The Stratus 36 is heavier, displacing about 53% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Stratus 36 carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Stratus 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 82 MS rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.