Albin Accent vs Allegro 27
How do the Albin Accent and Allegro 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Accent 
Allegro 27 | Albin Accent | Allegro 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.4 ft8.05 m | 26.4 ft8.03 m |
| Waterline length | 20.5 ft6.25 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.77 m | 9.1 ft2.76 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.54 m | 4.1 ft1.25 m |
| Displacement | 5,512 lb2,500 kg | 7,496 lb3,400 kg |
| Ballast | 1,962 lb890 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Sail area | 290 ft²26.9 m² | 334 ft²31.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.87 | 13.95 |
| Displacement / Length | 285 | 241 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.2 | 24.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | €3,900 | €6,200 |
Albin Accent vs Allegro 27: the short version
- The Albin Accent and Allegro 27 are close in length (26.4 ft8.05 m vs 26.4 ft8.03 m ).
- The Allegro 27 is heavier, displacing about 36% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Accent carries the more powerful rig (14.9 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Allegro 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Allegro 27 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.