Albin Ballad vs Annie 30
How do the Albin Ballad and Annie 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Albin Ballad | Annie 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 22.6 ft6.90 m | 24.5 ft7.47 m |
| Beam | 9.7 ft2.96 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 11,027 lb5,002 kg |
| Ballast | 3,527 lb1,600 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 538 ft²50.0 m² | 458 ft²42.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.93 | 14.79 |
| Displacement / Length | 280 | 335 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.9 | 32.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 1.71 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | €9,900 | — |
Albin Ballad vs Annie 30: the short version
- The Albin Ballad and Annie 30 are close in length (30.0 ft9.14 m vs 30.0 ft9.14 m ).
- The Annie 30 is heavier, displacing about 52% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Ballad carries the more powerful rig (22.9 vs 14.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Annie 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Annie 30 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.