Albin Cumulus vs Hunter 28.5
How do the Albin Cumulus and Hunter 28.5 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Cumulus 
Hunter 28.5 | Albin Cumulus | Hunter 28.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.4 ft8.64 m | 28.4 ft8.66 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.80 m | 23.8 ft7.24 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.85 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 8,157 lb3,700 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Ballast | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 463 ft²43.0 m² | 397 ft²36.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.28 | 17.36 |
| Displacement / Length | 328 | 233 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.6 | 18.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.86 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | €9,900 | — |
Albin Cumulus vs Hunter 28.5: the short version
- The Albin Cumulus and Hunter 28.5 are close in length (28.4 ft8.64 m vs 28.4 ft8.66 m ).
- The Albin Cumulus is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Cumulus carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin Cumulus scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin Cumulus rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.