Albin Cumulus vs Laser 28
How do the Albin Cumulus and Laser 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Cumulus 
Laser 28 | Albin Cumulus | Laser 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.4 ft8.64 m | 28.4 ft8.66 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.80 m | 23.6 ft7.19 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.85 m | 9.5 ft2.89 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 8,157 lb3,700 kg | 3,950 lb1,792 kg |
| Ballast | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 1,500 lb680 kg |
| Sail area | 463 ft²43.0 m² | 365 ft²33.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.28 | 23.37 |
| Displacement / Length | 328 | 134 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.6 | 12.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.86 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | €9,900 | — |
Albin Cumulus vs Laser 28: the short version
- The Albin Cumulus and Laser 28 are close in length (28.4 ft8.64 m vs 28.4 ft8.66 m ).
- The Albin Cumulus is heavier, displacing about 107% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Laser 28 carries the more powerful rig (23.4 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin Cumulus scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin Cumulus rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.