Albin Express vs Amphibi-Con 25
How do the Albin Express and Amphibi-Con 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Express 
Amphibi-Con 25 | Albin Express | Amphibi-Con 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.5 ft7.77 m | 25.4 ft7.75 m |
| Waterline length | 21.6 ft6.58 m | 21.7 ft6.61 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 3,500 lb1,588 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 299 ft²27.8 m² | 277 ft²25.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.09 | 19.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 176 | 154 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.3 | 15.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.07 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | €5,000 | — |
Albin Express vs Amphibi-Con 25: the short version
- The Albin Express and Amphibi-Con 25 are close in length (25.5 ft7.77 m vs 25.4 ft7.75 m ).
- The Albin Express is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Amphibi-Con 25 carries the more powerful rig (19.2 vs 19.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin Express scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Amphibi-Con 25 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.07).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.