Albin Express vs Delta 31
How do the Albin Express and Delta 31 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Express 
Delta 31 | Albin Express | Delta 31 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.5 ft7.77 m | 30.7 ft9.35 m |
| Waterline length | 21.6 ft6.58 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 10.0 ft3.04 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 8,598 lb3,900 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 3,505 lb1,590 kg |
| Sail area | 299 ft²27.8 m² | 436 ft²40.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.09 | 16.62 |
| Displacement / Length | 176 | 248 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.3 | 23.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.07 | 1.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Average used price | €5,000 | — |
Albin Express vs Delta 31: the short version
- The Delta 31 is the larger boat at 30.7 ft9.35 m LOA versus 25.5 ft7.77 m for the Albin Express.
- The Delta 31 is heavier, displacing about 117% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Express carries the more powerful rig (19.1 vs 16.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Delta 31 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Delta 31 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 2.07).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.