Albin Express vs Nimbus 42
How do the Albin Express and Nimbus 42 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Express 
Nimbus 42 | Albin Express | Nimbus 42 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.5 ft7.77 m | 41.4 ft12.62 m |
| Waterline length | 21.6 ft6.58 m | 34.2 ft10.42 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 12.5 ft3.81 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 23,325 lb10,580 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 10,000 lb4,536 kg |
| Sail area | 299 ft²27.8 m² | 854 ft²79.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.09 | 16.74 |
| Displacement / Length | 176 | 261 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.3 | 34.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.07 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 7.8 |
| Average used price | €5,000 | — |
Albin Express vs Nimbus 42: the short version
- The Nimbus 42 is the larger boat at 41.4 ft12.62 m LOA versus 25.5 ft7.77 m for the Albin Express.
- The Nimbus 42 is heavier, displacing about 488% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Express carries the more powerful rig (19.1 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nimbus 42 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nimbus 42 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 2.07).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.