Albin Express vs Singoalla 34
How do the Albin Express and Singoalla 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Express 
Singoalla 34 | Albin Express | Singoalla 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.5 ft7.77 m | 33.7 ft10.26 m |
| Waterline length | 21.6 ft6.58 m | 27.3 ft8.33 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 8,820 lb4,001 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 3,750 lb1,701 kg |
| Sail area | 299 ft²27.8 m² | 433 ft²40.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.09 | 16.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 176 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.3 | 19.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.07 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 7.0 |
| Average used price | €5,000 | — |
Albin Express vs Singoalla 34: the short version
- The Singoalla 34 is the larger boat at 33.7 ft10.26 m LOA versus 25.5 ft7.77 m for the Albin Express.
- The Singoalla 34 is heavier, displacing about 122% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Express carries the more powerful rig (19.1 vs 16.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Singoalla 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin Express rates better for offshore work (2.07 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.