Albin Vega vs Nimbus 42
How do the Albin Vega and Nimbus 42 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Vega 
Nimbus 42 | Albin Vega | Nimbus 42 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.1 ft8.25 m | 41.4 ft12.62 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 34.2 ft10.42 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.46 m | 12.5 ft3.81 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Displacement | 5,070 lb2,300 kg | 23,325 lb10,580 kg |
| Ballast | 2,017 lb915 kg | 10,000 lb4,536 kg |
| Sail area | 304 ft²28.2 m² | 854 ft²79.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.48 | 16.74 |
| Displacement / Length | 186 | 261 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.0 | 34.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.88 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 7.8 |
| Average used price | €3,500 | — |
Albin Vega vs Nimbus 42: the short version
- The Nimbus 42 is the larger boat at 41.4 ft12.62 m LOA versus 27.1 ft8.25 m for the Albin Vega.
- The Nimbus 42 is heavier, displacing about 360% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nimbus 42 carries the more powerful rig (16.7 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nimbus 42 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nimbus 42 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 1.88).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.