Albin Vega vs Singoalla 34
How do the Albin Vega and Singoalla 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Vega 
Singoalla 34 | Albin Vega | Singoalla 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.1 ft8.25 m | 33.7 ft10.26 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 27.3 ft8.33 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.46 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 5,070 lb2,300 kg | 8,820 lb4,001 kg |
| Ballast | 2,017 lb915 kg | 3,750 lb1,701 kg |
| Sail area | 304 ft²28.2 m² | 433 ft²40.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.48 | 16.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 186 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.0 | 19.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.88 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 7.0 |
| Average used price | €3,500 | — |
Albin Vega vs Singoalla 34: the short version
- The Singoalla 34 is the larger boat at 33.7 ft10.26 m LOA versus 27.1 ft8.25 m for the Albin Vega.
- The Singoalla 34 is heavier, displacing about 74% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Vega carries the more powerful rig (16.5 vs 16.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin Vega scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin Vega rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.