Albin Viggen sailboat vs Stone Horse
How do the Albin Viggen sailboat and Stone Horse compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Viggen sailboat 
Stone Horse | Albin Viggen sailboat | Stone Horse | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.3 ft7.10 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 18.3 ft5.59 m |
| Beam | 7.3 ft2.24 m | 7.1 ft2.16 m |
| Draft | 3.6 ft1.11 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 3,086 lb1,400 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | 1,323 lb600 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Sail area | 218 ft²20.3 m² | 315 ft²29.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.46 | 18.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 172 | 326 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 25.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.7 |
Albin Viggen sailboat vs Stone Horse: the short version
- The Albin Viggen sailboat and Stone Horse are close in length (23.3 ft7.10 m vs 23.3 ft7.11 m ).
- The Stone Horse is heavier, displacing about 46% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Stone Horse carries the more powerful rig (18.5 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Stone Horse scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Stone Horse rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.