Albin Viggen vs Bluenose one-design sloop
How do the Albin Viggen and Bluenose one-design sloop compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Viggen 
Bluenose one-design sloop | Albin Viggen | Bluenose one-design sloop | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.3 ft7.10 m | 23.4 ft7.14 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 16.0 ft4.88 m |
| Beam | 7.4 ft2.25 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Draft | 3.6 ft1.11 m | 3.7 ft1.12 m |
| Displacement | 3,086 lb1,400 kg | 2,050 lb930 kg |
| Ballast | 1,323 lb600 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 291 ft²27.0 m² | 218 ft²20.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.97 | 21.61 |
| Displacement / Length | 180 | 223 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.0 | 15.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 1.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.4 |
| Average used price | €2,000 | — |
Albin Viggen vs Bluenose one-design sloop: the short version
- The Albin Viggen and Bluenose one-design sloop are close in length (23.3 ft7.10 m vs 23.4 ft7.14 m ).
- The Albin Viggen is heavier, displacing about 51% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Viggen carries the more powerful rig (22.0 vs 21.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin Viggen scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bluenose one-design sloop rates better for offshore work (1.97 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.