Albin Viggen vs Stone Horse
How do the Albin Viggen and Stone Horse compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Viggen | Albin Viggen | Stone Horse | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.3 ft7.10 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 18.3 ft5.59 m |
| Beam | 7.4 ft2.25 m | 7.1 ft2.16 m |
| Draft | 3.6 ft1.11 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 3,086 lb1,400 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | 1,323 lb600 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Sail area | 291 ft²27.0 m² | 315 ft²29.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.97 | 18.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 180 | 326 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.0 | 25.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.7 |
| Average used price | €2,000 | — |
Albin Viggen vs Stone Horse: the short version
- The Albin Viggen and Stone Horse are close in length (23.3 ft7.10 m vs 23.3 ft7.11 m ).
- The Stone Horse is heavier, displacing about 46% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Viggen carries the more powerful rig (22.0 vs 18.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Stone Horse scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Stone Horse rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.