Alden 44 vs Hunter Passage 450
How do the Alden 44 and Hunter Passage 450 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alden 44 | Alden 44 | Hunter Passage 450 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 44.2 ft13.46 m | 44.3 ft13.49 m |
| Waterline length | 34.1 ft10.39 m | 38.6 ft11.76 m |
| Beam | 12.5 ft3.81 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Draft | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 24,500 lb11,113 kg | 26,180 lb11,875 kg |
| Ballast | 10,000 lb4,536 kg | 9,680 lb4,391 kg |
| Sail area | 871 ft²80.9 m² | 884 ft²82.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.52 | 16.04 |
| Displacement / Length | 276 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 35.3 | 29.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.72 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.8 | 8.3 |
Alden 44 vs Hunter Passage 450: the short version
- The Alden 44 and Hunter Passage 450 are close in length (44.2 ft13.46 m vs 44.3 ft13.49 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Alden 44 carries the more powerful rig (16.5 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alden 44 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alden 44 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 1.89).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.