Alegria 67 vs Swan 76
How do the Alegria 67 and Swan 76 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alegria 67 | Alegria 67 | Swan 76 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 66.8 ft20.36 m | 61.4 ft18.70 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 61.4 ft18.70 m |
| Beam | 32.3 ft9.84 m | 19.0 ft5.80 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Displacement | 77,162 lb35,000 kg | 98,767 lb44,800 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 24,000 lb10,886 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 2,449 ft²227.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 18.34 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 191 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 49.2 |
| Capsize screening | 3.03 | 1.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 10.5 |
Alegria 67 vs Swan 76: the short version
- The Alegria 67 is the larger boat at 66.8 ft20.36 m LOA versus 61.4 ft18.70 m for the Swan 76.
- The Swan 76 is heavier, displacing about 28% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 76 rates better for offshore work (1.65 vs 3.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.