Alegria 67 vs Swan 82
How do the Alegria 67 and Swan 82 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alegria 67 | Alegria 67 | Swan 82 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 66.8 ft20.36 m | 69.8 ft21.26 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 69.8 ft21.26 m |
| Beam | 32.3 ft9.84 m | 19.2 ft5.86 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 12.4 ft3.78 m |
| Displacement | 77,162 lb35,000 kg | 83,776 lb38,000 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 29,300 lb13,290 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 3,474 ft²322.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 29.03 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 110 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 36.2 |
| Capsize screening | 3.03 | 1.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 11.2 |
Alegria 67 vs Swan 82: the short version
- The Swan 82 is the larger boat at 69.8 ft21.26 m LOA versus 66.8 ft20.36 m for the Alegria 67.
- The Swan 82 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 82 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 3.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.