Alegria 67 vs Swan 86
How do the Alegria 67 and Swan 86 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alegria 67 | Alegria 67 | Swan 86 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 66.8 ft20.36 m | 69.2 ft21.10 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 69.2 ft21.10 m |
| Beam | 32.3 ft9.84 m | 20.3 ft6.20 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 11.5 ft3.50 m |
| Displacement | 77,162 lb35,000 kg | 121,254 lb55,000 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 44,000 lb19,958 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 3,058 ft²284.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 19.97 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 163 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 49.0 |
| Capsize screening | 3.03 | 1.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 11.1 |
Alegria 67 vs Swan 86: the short version
- The Swan 86 is the larger boat at 69.2 ft21.10 m LOA versus 66.8 ft20.36 m for the Alegria 67.
- The Swan 86 is heavier, displacing about 57% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 86 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 3.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.