Alerion Express 19 vs Flying Scot
How do the Alerion Express 19 and Flying Scot compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Alerion Express 19 | Flying Scot | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.2 ft5.84 m | 19.0 ft5.79 m |
| Waterline length | 18.9 ft5.77 m | 18.5 ft5.64 m |
| Beam | 8.7 ft2.64 m | 6.8 ft2.06 m |
| Draft | 4.2 ft1.27 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 1,750 lb794 kg | 850 lb386 kg |
| Ballast | 300 lb136 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 272 ft²25.3 m² | 191 ft²17.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 29.97 | 34.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 115 | 60 |
| Comfort ratio | 8.0 | 5.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.88 | 2.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Alerion Express 19 vs Flying Scot: the short version
- The Alerion Express 19 and Flying Scot are close in length (19.2 ft5.84 m vs 19.0 ft5.79 m ).
- The Alerion Express 19 is heavier, displacing about 106% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Flying Scot carries the more powerful rig (34.1 vs 30.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alerion Express 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Flying Scot rates better for offshore work (2.85 vs 2.88).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
Flying Scot