Allegra 24 vs Blue Water 24
How do the Allegra 24 and Blue Water 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Allegra 24 Matrix Marine/Wilmette Boat Works · 1984 Blue Water 24 Blue Water Boats/Holden Laminates · 1961 | Allegra 24 | Blue Water 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.9 ft7.29 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 20.8 ft6.35 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.6 ft2.62 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 4.1 ft1.24 m |
| Displacement | 6,200 lb2,812 kg | 7,950 lb3,606 kg |
| Ballast | 2,200 lb998 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 359 ft²33.4 m² | 276 ft²25.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.02 | 11.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 306 | 466 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.6 | 33.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.74 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 5.9 |
Allegra 24 vs Blue Water 24: the short version
- The Allegra 24 and Blue Water 24 are close in length (23.9 ft7.29 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Blue Water 24 is heavier, displacing about 28% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Allegra 24 carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 11.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Blue Water 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Blue Water 24 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 1.74).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.