Allegra 24 vs Bridges Point 24
How do the Allegra 24 and Bridges Point 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Allegra 24 | Allegra 24 | Bridges Point 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.9 ft7.29 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 20.8 ft6.35 m | 18.7 ft5.69 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 3.4 ft1.04 m |
| Displacement | 6,200 lb2,812 kg | 3,944 lb1,789 kg |
| Ballast | 2,200 lb998 kg | 2,100 lb953 kg |
| Sail area | 359 ft²33.4 m² | 278 ft²25.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.02 | 17.82 |
| Displacement / Length | 306 | 271 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.6 | 19.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.74 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 5.8 |
Allegra 24 vs Bridges Point 24: the short version
- The Allegra 24 and Bridges Point 24 are close in length (23.9 ft7.29 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Allegra 24 is heavier, displacing about 57% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bridges Point 24 carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Allegra 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Allegra 24 rates better for offshore work (1.74 vs 1.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.