Allegro 27 vs Helmsman 26
How do the Allegro 27 and Helmsman 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Allegro 27 | Allegro 27 | Helmsman 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.4 ft8.03 m | 26.3 ft8.02 m |
| Waterline length | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 20.7 ft6.30 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 4.9 ft1.48 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 4,630 lb2,100 kg |
| Ballast | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 334 ft²31.0 m² | 409 ft²38.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.95 | 23.56 |
| Displacement / Length | 241 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.9 | 16.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.85 | 2.21 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | €6,200 | €7,200 |
Allegro 27 vs Helmsman 26: the short version
- The Allegro 27 and Helmsman 26 are close in length (26.4 ft8.03 m vs 26.3 ft8.02 m ).
- The Allegro 27 is heavier, displacing about 62% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Helmsman 26 carries the more powerful rig (23.6 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Allegro 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Allegro 27 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.