Allegro 27 vs Paceship PY 26
How do the Allegro 27 and Paceship PY 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Allegro 27 
Paceship PY 26 | Allegro 27 | Paceship PY 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.4 ft8.03 m | 26.3 ft8.03 m |
| Waterline length | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 6,000 lb2,722 kg |
| Ballast | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 2,200 lb998 kg |
| Sail area | 334 ft²31.0 m² | 339 ft²31.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.95 | 16.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 241 | 235 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.9 | 19.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.85 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | €6,200 | — |
Allegro 27 vs Paceship PY 26: the short version
- The Allegro 27 and Paceship PY 26 are close in length (26.4 ft8.03 m vs 26.3 ft8.03 m ).
- The Allegro 27 is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Paceship PY 26 carries the more powerful rig (16.4 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Allegro 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Allegro 27 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.