Aloha 27 vs C&C 27 Mk V
How do the Aloha 27 and C&C 27 Mk V compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aloha 27 
C&C 27 Mk V | Aloha 27 | C&C 27 Mk V | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.5 ft8.08 m | 26.5 ft8.08 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 9.4 ft2.87 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 4.8 ft1.46 m |
| Displacement | 5,200 lb2,359 kg | 4,420 lb2,005 kg |
| Ballast | 2,000 lb907 kg | 1,715 lb778 kg |
| Sail area | 340 ft²31.6 m² | 343 ft²31.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.12 | 20.38 |
| Displacement / Length | 204 | 162 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.1 | 14.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Aloha 27 vs C&C 27 Mk V: the short version
- The Aloha 27 and C&C 27 Mk V are close in length (26.5 ft8.08 m vs 26.5 ft8.08 m ).
- The Aloha 27 is heavier, displacing about 18% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 27 Mk V carries the more powerful rig (20.4 vs 18.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Aloha 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Aloha 27 rates better for offshore work (2.17 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.