Aloha 28 vs E-Scow
How do the Aloha 28 and E-Scow compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aloha 28 
E-Scow | Aloha 28 | E-Scow | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Waterline length | 24.5 ft7.47 m | —— |
| Beam | 9.4 ft2.87 m | 6.8 ft2.06 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 6,750 lb3,062 kg | 965 lb438 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 373 ft²34.7 m² | 323 ft²30.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.71 | 52.92 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 20.6 | — |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 2.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | — |
Aloha 28 vs E-Scow: the short version
- The Aloha 28 and E-Scow are close in length (28.0 ft8.53 m vs 28.0 ft8.53 m ).
- The Aloha 28 is heavier, displacing about 599% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the E-Scow carries the more powerful rig (52.9 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Aloha 28 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.