Aloha 28 vs Marieholm 28 (281)
How do the Aloha 28 and Marieholm 28 (281) compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aloha 28 
Marieholm 28 (281) | Aloha 28 | Marieholm 28 (281) | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 28.1 ft8.56 m |
| Waterline length | 24.5 ft7.47 m | 23.6 ft7.20 m |
| Beam | 9.4 ft2.87 m | 9.7 ft2.94 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 6,750 lb3,062 kg | 8,378 lb3,800 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 3,417 lb1,550 kg |
| Sail area | 373 ft²34.7 m² | 452 ft²42.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.71 | 17.53 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 284 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.6 | 25.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | — | €9,800 |
Aloha 28 vs Marieholm 28 (281): the short version
- The Aloha 28 and Marieholm 28 (281) are close in length (28.0 ft8.53 m vs 28.1 ft8.56 m ).
- The Marieholm 28 (281) is heavier, displacing about 24% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Marieholm 28 (281) carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Marieholm 28 (281) scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marieholm 28 (281) rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 1.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.