Aloha 30 vs Ranger 30
How do the Aloha 30 and Ranger 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aloha 30 
Ranger 30 | Aloha 30 | Ranger 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 26.0 ft7.92 m | 25.4 ft7.75 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 10.8 ft3.28 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.75 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 6,800 lb3,084 kg | 10,500 lb4,763 kg |
| Ballast | 2,960 lb1,343 kg | 4,300 lb1,950 kg |
| Sail area | 439 ft²40.8 m² | 462 ft²42.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.57 | 15.42 |
| Displacement / Length | 173 | 285 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.0 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.8 | 6.8 |
Aloha 30 vs Ranger 30: the short version
- The Aloha 30 and Ranger 30 are close in length (30.0 ft9.14 m vs 30.0 ft9.14 m ).
- The Ranger 30 is heavier, displacing about 54% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Aloha 30 carries the more powerful rig (19.6 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ranger 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ranger 30 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.