Aloha 32 vs Ranger 32
How do the Aloha 32 and Ranger 32 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aloha 32 | Aloha 32 | Ranger 32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.4 ft9.88 m | 32.5 ft9.91 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 25.8 ft7.87 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.30 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 9,800 lb4,445 kg | 9,500 lb4,309 kg |
| Ballast | 4,018 lb1,823 kg | 4,480 lb2,032 kg |
| Sail area | 524 ft²48.7 m² | 447 ft²41.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.31 | 15.94 |
| Displacement / Length | 280 | 246 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.3 | 22.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 6.8 |
Aloha 32 vs Ranger 32: the short version
- The Aloha 32 and Ranger 32 are close in length (32.4 ft9.88 m vs 32.5 ft9.91 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Aloha 32 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Aloha 32 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Aloha 32 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.