Alpha 180 AF vs Baby Cat
How do the Alpha 180 AF and Baby Cat compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alpha 180 AF | Alpha 180 AF | Baby Cat | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 8.4 ft2.55 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.66 m | 2.6 ft0.80 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 39 lb18 kg | 49 lb22 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.56 | 2.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Alpha 180 AF vs Baby Cat: the short version
- The Alpha 180 AF and Baby Cat are close in length (8.2 ft2.50 m vs 8.4 ft2.55 m ).
- The Baby Cat is heavier, displacing about 26% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alpha 180 AF rates better for offshore work (2.56 vs 2.86).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.