Alpha 180 AF vs Cape Cod Frosty
How do the Alpha 180 AF and Cape Cod Frosty compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alpha 180 AF | Alpha 180 AF | Cape Cod Frosty | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 6.3 ft1.93 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.66 m | 2.8 ft0.84 m |
| Draft | —— | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 39 lb18 kg | 34 lb15 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 25 ft²2.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 38.11 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.56 | 3.41 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Alpha 180 AF vs Cape Cod Frosty: the short version
- The Alpha 180 AF is the larger boat at 8.2 ft2.50 m LOA versus 6.3 ft1.93 m for the Cape Cod Frosty.
- The Alpha 180 AF is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alpha 180 AF rates better for offshore work (2.56 vs 3.41).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.