Alpha 180 AF vs Hookipa Naish
How do the Alpha 180 AF and Hookipa Naish compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alpha 180 AF | Alpha 180 AF | Hookipa Naish | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.66 m | 1.9 ft0.57 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 39 lb18 kg | 18 lb8 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.56 | 2.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Alpha 180 AF vs Hookipa Naish: the short version
- The Alpha 180 AF and Hookipa Naish are close in length (8.2 ft2.50 m vs 8.5 ft2.60 m ).
- The Alpha 180 AF is heavier, displacing about 117% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alpha 180 AF rates better for offshore work (2.56 vs 2.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.