Alpha 180 AF vs Le 260
How do the Alpha 180 AF and Le 260 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alpha 180 AF | Alpha 180 AF | Le 260 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.66 m | 1.6 ft0.50 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 39 lb18 kg | 13 lb6 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.56 | 2.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Alpha 180 AF vs Le 260: the short version
- The Alpha 180 AF and Le 260 are close in length (8.2 ft2.50 m vs 8.5 ft2.60 m ).
- The Alpha 180 AF is heavier, displacing about 200% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alpha 180 AF rates better for offshore work (2.56 vs 2.79).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.